TextPulses

Browser-side checker

Readability Checker

The Readability Checker highlights the parts of a draft that may slow readers down. It combines sentence length, reading level, long sentence warnings, paragraph structure, and Publish Readiness signals so you can revise for clarity without flattening the meaning. Use it for help articles, landing pages, policy summaries, blog posts, and technical drafts that need to be understood by busy readers. The checker is intentionally cautious: it does not say simple writing is always better, and it does not replace subject expertise. It simply points out where the reader may need a shorter sentence, clearer heading, or better example.

Live analyzer

Count, clean, and check fit before you publish

Privacy-first: your text stays in your browser.

Ready for private browser-based analysis.

Unique tool

PublishFit Score

Choose a channel and TextPulses checks length, clarity, readability, keyword balance, and publication readiness using transparent browser-side rules.

Score

0

Needs improvement
Current length
0 words
Recommended limit
600+ words for useful depth; keep sections scannable.

Clarity

Needs work

0/100

Keyword density

Needs work

0/100

Readability

Needs work

0/100

Publication readiness

Needs work

0/100

Actionable recommendations

  • Paste or write text to generate channel-specific recommendations.

Browser-side report

Publish Readiness Report

Publish Readiness Report
Main issue detected: Clarity needs the most attention
Best channel fit: Blog Article
Length risk: Needs improvement
Readability risk: Needs work
Keyword repetition risk: Needs work
Sentence flow risk: Needs work
Scanability risk: Needs work
3 practical edits to improve this draft:
1. Paste or write text to generate channel-specific recommendations.
Final pre-publish checklist: clear purpose; useful structure; cautious claims; natural repetition; human review complete.
Disclaimer: estimates are practical signals, not guarantees.

No backend, no external AI, and no draft upload. The report is generated locally in your browser.

Writing Health

Rule-based quality signals

Scores use simple, transparent rules. They are helpful signals, not editorial verdicts.

Clarity Score

0

Variety Score

0

Keyword Balance

0

Sentence Flow

0

Readability

0

PublishFit

0

Warnings to review

  • Add text to generate writing health scores.

Keyword density

Top words and phrase frequency

Stop words are ignored for one-word density so repeated meaningful terms stand out faster.

One-word phrases

Add more text to see phrase frequency.

Two-word phrases

Add more text to see phrase frequency.

Three-word phrases

Add more text to see phrase frequency.

What this checker helps you decide

  • Whether sentences are too long for the audience.
  • Whether paragraphs are easy to scan.
  • Whether the draft needs examples or simpler structure.

How to use this tool

  1. Paste the full section you want to review, not just one sentence.
  2. Scan the longest sentence and reading level before rewriting.
  3. Split dense paragraphs when they hide multiple ideas.
  4. Keep specialist terms when they are necessary, but define them when the audience may need help.

Practical examples

A support article.
A technical introduction.
A policy summary.
A landing page section.

Common mistakes

  • Chasing a score while removing necessary precision.
  • Leaving one idea buried in a long paragraph.
  • Using corporate filler instead of direct language.
  • Ignoring audience expertise.

Final checklist

  • Split the longest sentence.
  • Define specialist terms.
  • Add headings where the topic shifts.
  • Keep one main idea per paragraph.
  • Read the final draft aloud.

FAQ

Is a higher readability score always better?

No. Very simple writing may be wrong for expert, legal, technical, or academic audiences.

What should I edit first?

Start with the longest sentences and paragraphs because they often create the clearest friction.

Does readability affect SEO?

Readable content can support user experience, but a score does not guarantee ranking or traffic.

Can this check factual accuracy?

No. It checks practical writing signals, not whether claims are true or complete.

Related resources

Estimates are practical signals, not guarantees.